[BACK
TO MAIN PAGE][BACK]
Editors : Prof. S.V. RAMASWAMY & Er. I.V. ANIRUDHAN |
||||||||||||
|
From the Editor’s Desk.. Flyash as AdmixtureBased on the inputs from Prof. S Chandrakaran, NIT, Calicut Effective use of soil - flyash mixtures in which flyash is used as an admixture is yet to be done in large scale. There are still apprehensions about using the material as the base material because of its lightweight and relatively low shear strength characteristics. However specification for constructing embankments using flyash as a base material published elsewhere in this newsletter will be of help in increasing the use of soil-fly ash mixtures in such constructions. Studies by Virendra Singh, and others, presented at Baroda during IGC-97 indicated that there was a significant improvement in CBR and unconfined compression strength of fine alluvial silty soil by the addition of 10 to 15% fly ash. The resulting mixture can be used as sub-base material in road construction. However a greater percentage of flyash resulted in a considerable reduction in these properties. Hence fly ash consumption in these constructions is likely to be marginal compared to the production. Studies by Chandrakaran using fly as an admixture to lateritic soil presents a different picture. Generally lateritic soil is considered a good construction material, except for pure lateritic clays or silts. Chandrakaran reports that there is progressive ‘degradation’ of the base material, lateritic soil, with the addition of more and more fly ash. There is an increase in plasticity of the lateritic soil due to addition of fly ash and flocculation is cited as the cause of this phenomenon. Increase in plasticity characteristics and flocculation will improve the quality of laterite as a lining material. On the other hand the coefficient of permeability marginally increases with the addition of fly ash, thus reducing the effectiveness of laterite - fly ash mixture as a liner. There is also a notable reduction in shear strength with the addition of fly ash. Similar behaviour is reported with respect to the CBR values. All these findings on lateritic soil - fly ash mixture in different proportion point to very limited utility of fly ash where lateritic soil is available as base material. When we approach the results in the other direction in which the lateritic soil is acting as an admixture, 50 to 60% (by total weight) addition of laterite into the fly ash can improve the quality of fly ash as a construction material where shear strength requirements are not very critical. The major field where replacement of 50 to 60% laterite with fly ash can prove advantageous is in the lining of canals and ponds. Use of lateritic clay in the construction of lining with fly ash as a one to one admixture can be successful. ¤ Prof. S. Chandrakaran, NIT Calicut,’Ground improvement by Lime and Flyash Column Method’, Short Term Course on Gorund Improvement, IIT Madras, December 2003. Felicitation of Founders & Past Chairmen of IGSCC IGS, Chennai Chapter organized a pleasant function on October 15, 2003 to felicitate the eminent geotechnical engineers who had successfully started the chapter and diligently nurtured its growth. The persons honoured were felicitated and presented with a memento. The persons honoured and the felicitators were, Dr.V.V.S.Rao (Er.V.Balakumar), Prof. A.Sargunan (Er.M.Elangovan), Prof. S.V.Ramaswamy (Dr.K.Premalatha), Dr. Varghese Chummar, (Er. K. Rajamani), Er. Shankar Guha (Prof. S.R. Gandhi), Dr. B.Ramanathan (Er.V.Balakumar) and Prof. M.R.Pranesh (Prof.K.Ilamparuthi). The mementoes were presented by Er. G.Sivaprakasam, Team Constructions. Prof. K.Ilamparuthi presided over the function and Er. I.V.Anirudhan proposed a vote of thanks. ¤
|
|
809 Murugesan V. 810 Rajkumar R. 811 Dodgoudar 812 Baddam Shyamala 813 Ramana Chandaka 814 Vijaya Lakshmi Rayapati 815 Darga Kumar N 816 Sangeetha M 817 Sudhakar Sunkura 819 Muthiah C
|
|||||||||
|
Geotechnical Calendar GEOSUPPORT – 2004, Geo-Institute of ASCE and ADSC: The International Association of Foundation Drilling, Orlando, Florida, USA, January 28 – 31, 2004 First CUSST Conference on Recent Advances in Civil Engineering, Civil Engineering Division, School of Engineering, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, March 25 – 27, 2004. Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics (GEOASIA 2004), South Korea, June 21 – 23, 2004. National Symposium on Advances in Geotechnical Engineering (NSAGE 2004), Karnataka Geotechnical Centre, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, July 22 - 23, 2004 Joint Speciality Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, July 26 – 28, 2004. The Seventh International Conference on the Application of Stresswave Theory to Piles –Malaysia – August 8-10, 2004 sec@iem.po.my International Conference on Site Characterisation, Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 20 – 22, 2004 Indian Geotechnical Conference – 2004, Ground Engineering – Emerging Techniques, Indian Geotechnical Societies, Warangal and Kakinada Chapters, Dec. 17 – 19, 2004. Indian Geotechnical Conference – 2005, Indian Geotechnical Society, Ahmedabad Chapter, Ahmedabad, December 2005. |
||||||||||||
|
Proceedings & Manual for sale |
Cost |
Postal |
|
Proceedings, Indian Geotechnical Conference 1996 “Geotechnical Engineering practice beyond 2001”. |
Rs. 500 |
Rs. 78 |
|
Proceedings one day seminar on “Bored cast-in-situ piles experiences in design and construction”. Indian Geotechnical Society (Chennai Chapter). |
Rs. 100 |
Rs. 33 |
|
Proceedings one day seminar on “Current trends in environmental geotechniques”. Indian Geotechnical Society (Chennai Chapter). |
Rs. 100 |
Rs. 33 |
|
Manual – “Lateritic Soils in Engineering practice”. Indian Geotechnical Society (Chennai Chapter). |
Rs. 50 |
Rs. 33 |
|
Proceedings one day seminar on “Recent trends on application of geosynthetics” Indian Geotechnical Society (Chennai Chapter). |
Rs. 100 |
Rs. 33 |
|
Activities During OCT-DEC - 2003 LECTURES LECTURES Dr. V.V.S. Rao, Nagadi Consultants, Founder Chairman of IGS Madras Chapter, “ Facts and Fiction in Geotechnical Practice” Terzaghi Lecture on 15.10.2003. OTHER ACTIVITIES Felicitation of Founders and Past Chairmen of IGS Madras Chapter. Dr. V.V.S. Rao (Founder Chairman), Prof. A Sargunan (Founder Secretary), Prof. S.V. Ramaswamy, Er. Shankar Guha, Dr. Varghese Chummar, Prof. M.R. Pranesh and Dr. B. Ramanathan were felicitated. |
A PANEL DISCUSSION ON LATERAL LOAD TESTS ON PILES will be held at 9:30 AM on January 31, 2004 at IIT Chennai. Many experts on the subject will be participating in the deliberations. All are invited Lead Speaker - Dr. Kumar Pitchumani , L& T Ramboll, Chennai The issues under review
|
||
|
Construction of Fly-ash Embankments — Prof. S.R. Gandhi Various studies on the utilisation of flyash in engineering applications have confirmed the potential of this lightweight waste material in the construction of embankments. Initial studies were directed towards the usage of this waste material as an admixture to clayey soil making it suitable for construction. Eventually the ash by itself is found to be suitable embankment material because of its effectiveness in compaction and possible control in the construction quality, etc. However, highly eroding nature of the material calls for suitable protection. Usually the ash slurry discharged takes a long time to get drained, mainly because of the terrains of the pond. The deposited ash is ready for lifting only after draining off. Borrow Area: Flyash could be collected directly from the designated areas in the pond and the depth of cut in all parts of borrow area shall be specified. The appropriate point of collection shall be the discharge point where the ash has more coarser material, but is not always practical. Similar to soil borrow areas, fly ash ponds can also be infested by vegetation, stumps, roots, bush, rubbish and other objectionable material. These materials are to be removed from the ash used in the embankment. Standard proctor maximum dry density and the optimum moisture content (As per IS:2720, Part VII), maximum and minimum dry density (As per IS 2720-part XIV) are found useful in the case of flyash also. Dry ash shall not be excavated to minimize the dust pollution. Additional moisture if required shall be introduced in the borrow area by watering well in advance of excavation to ensure uniformity in moisture content. Any excessive moisture can be removed by excavating drainage ditches and by allowing adequate time for drying. It is necessary to avoid ponding in borrow areas during excavation operation. Drainage ditches from borrow areas can be used for this purpose. It is necessary to adopt environmental safe methods like transportation through covered trucks, conveyer system, etc. Placing and Compaction of Ash Fill Fill material shall be placed only when the weather conditions are satisfactory to permit accurate control of the moisture content in the fill. During monsoon, before stopping filling work for any continuous spell, the top surface shall be graded to facilitate run off. The ash should be dumped in the central portion of the embankment in rainy season and near the slopes during dry periods. The ash can be spread by means of dozer / tractor with special attachments or other earth moving equipments in nearly horizontal lifts of 0.20 to 0.25 m loose thickness. Usually a stretch of 100 metres over the entire width of the embankment shall be acceptable. The moisture content of the spread ash can vary greatly from place to place and hence, some adjustment of moisture content according to the requirements may be necessary prior to compaction. Compaction Equipment: Vibratory rollers having 7 to 11 t. load (static linear load of 20 to 35 kg/cm), frequency range of 1100 to 1800 rpm with amplitude of vibration between 0.5 mm and 1.7 mm have proved effective for constructing the ash layers. The pressure exerted by the rollers shall be such that the roller will not cut into the ash surface. For a localized construction, small vibrating rollers with dead weight of approximately 1500 kg are found effective. The combination of both small size (1500 kg) and large size (7 to 11 t) vibrating rollers may be utilized. In confined areas, hand held impact rammers with a large foot provide satisfactory results. It may be noted that the sheep foot rollers without vibration, smooth wheeled rollers and vibrating plates have not been successful on ash. Test Fill Section : A test fill section of approximately 15m x 8m x 2m height shall be constructed, and this can be a part of the embankment itself. By trials, a definite compaction procedure, lift thickness, moisture application and number of passes required to achieve 70% relative density is evolved. Rolling and Tamping : When each layer of material has been conditioned so as to have the proper moisture content uniformly distributed throughout the material, it shall be compacted by passing the roller. The layers should be compacted in strips overlapping not less than 0.6m .The exact number of passes shall be determined from the trial compaction to have relative density of 70%. The rollers or loaded vehicles should travel in a direction parallel to the axis of the dyke. The rollers shall always be pulled. Turning of the roller shall be made to ensure uniform compaction. Field density test shall be made after rolling and the dry density obtained should be corresponding to a relative density of 70%. If not, additional number of passes has to be made to get the density corresponding to 70% relative density. The compacted surface shall be moistened before the next layer of fill material is placed. If the rolled surface of any fill is found to be too wet for proper compaction, it shall be raked up, allowed to dry or allowed to be worked with a harrow or scarifier to reduce the moisture content to the required amount and it should be re-compacted before next layer of the fill is placed. If water is added on the surface after placing the fill material, tiller shall be used to mix up the layer to have uniform moisture content. Construction of soil cover It is necessary to provide a protection layer soil for the ash embankment. The pH value of soil shall be between 5.5 and 8.0. The soil to be used as soil cover shall be of CI or CL (preferably CI) as per IS classifications and should be non-erodable and capable of supporting vegetation and plantation when placed over ash embankment. It should not contain stones of 25 mm or more in size. The material shall be placed in continuous horizontal layers with the uncompacted thickness not more than 30 cm and conditioned to a moisture content, corresponding to optimum moisture content that obtained from the standard proctor test. The field moisture content should be within + 2 percent of the optimum moisture content. The soil shall be spread and compacted on the sides of ash, lift by lift, as the ash layer itself is constructed. The compaction procedure for this protection layer can be same as that adopted for the ash embankment. Field density test shall be made after rolling and the dry density obtained should be corresponding to a density equal to 95% of maximum dry density (Standard Proctor). To ensure proper compaction at the outer edge, the fill shall be kept adequately wider by at least 0.5 m on all sides and the outer edge dressed to true width and slope after compaction. |
|||